Choose the archetype the field rewards, then the sixty cards that best express it. Ladder data and controlled testing informed both decisions.
54
slots fixed by the Dragapult skeleton
6
flex slots per build in the report’s construction
2
builds: Control and Meta-predict
Kaggle metagame
The field shifted repeatedly. A general model let us train across archetypes and choose after the metagame settled. The archived ratings below come from different checkpoints, not a controlled same-model comparison.
What the hundred teams that finished highest played, 07/19 to 08/30. Grimmsnarl peaked at 56% and ended at 4%; Dragapult rose from 0% to 25%.
All 98 scored uploads, 17 June to 16 August, by upload date and public score, coloured by deck. The two selected submissions are ringed. Peak ratings: Alakazam 901.7, Grimmsnarl 1,023.0, and Dragapult 1,040.2. Scores before 7 August are as the earlier dashboard last recorded them.
Why Dragapult
Dragapult rewards setup, disruption, and damage placement. Turn-level evaluation values the board it builds; multi-action search sequences competing lines; information-gate sampling handles Drakloak’s reveal-and-keep decisions.
The payoff turn, seen from our seat. Phantom Dive does 200 to their Active and places six damage counters on their bench in any arrangement; Adrena-Brain moves up to three more from one of our Pokémon to one of theirs. Every turn before it, each Drakloak's Recon Directive looks at two cards and keeps one.
Decklist construction
Our library combines ladder and over-the-board lists. Inclusion rates identify the skeleton and help predict an opponent’s list for search. Cards appearing in at least 95% of lists define the report’s 54-slot starting point.
Each card’s share of the ladder’s Dragapult lists in the week before the deadline. Blue: the 20-card skeleton, in both our lists. Amber: flex cards we run. Hollow: flex cards we do not.
Two builds from one skeleton
Control emphasized consistency with Dudunsparce. Meta-predict included Chi-Yu to answer Crustle, a difficult matchup we expected to resurge.
The 10 cards that separate the two submitted lists: 6 swapped outright and 4 changed in count, moving 6 of the sixty slots.
Testing individual choices
Every variant faces the same seeded deals with seats swapped and the same pilot throughout. This isolates the effect of a card or card combination. The sensitivity figure remains a placeholder until the paired-match receipts arrive.
The meta-predict build with one choice undone at a time, against the same four ladder lists with the same pilot: 24 seeded pairs per cell, seats swapped, at a fifth of the Kaggle clock; a removed card becomes a Basic Fire Energy. A card earns its slot where removing it moves the bar.
The submitted lists
Both archived 60-card lists are preserved in full.
Chi-Yu / Watchtowerthe meta-predict build
Pokémon17
4DrakloakTWM-129
4DreepyTWM-128
3Dragapult exTWM-130
2MunkidoriTWM-95
1BudewPRE-4
1Chi-YuTWM-39
1Fezandipiti exSFA-38
1Meowth exPOR-62
Trainer34
4Buddy-Buddy PoffinTEF-144
4Crushing HammerSVI-168
4Lillie's DeterminationMEG-119
4Poké PadPOR-81
4Ultra BallSVI-196
3Boss’s OrdersPAL-172
3CrispinSCR-133
3Night StretcherSFA-61
2Team Rocket's WatchtowerDRI-180
1Jamming TowerTWM-153
1JudgeSVI-176
1Unfair StampTWM-165
Energy9
4Basic {R} EnergySVE-2
3Basic {P} EnergySVE-5
2Basic {D} EnergySVE-7
Chi-Yu / Watchtower — 60 cards, 23 distinct — the meta-predict build, submitted 16 August 2026.
Dudunsparce / Risky Ruinsthe control build
Pokémon19
4DrakloakTWM-129
4DreepyTWM-128
3Dragapult exTWM-130
2BudewPRE-4
2MunkidoriTWM-95
1DudunsparceTEF-129
1DunsparceJTG-120
1Fezandipiti exSFA-38
1Meowth exPOR-62
Trainer32
4Buddy-Buddy PoffinTEF-144
4Crushing HammerSVI-168
4Lillie's DeterminationMEG-119
4Poké PadPOR-81
4Ultra BallSVI-196
3Boss’s OrdersPAL-172
3CrispinSCR-133
2Night StretcherSFA-61
2Risky RuinsMEG-127
1JudgeSVI-176
1Unfair StampTWM-165
Energy9
4Basic {P} EnergySVE-5
3Basic {R} EnergySVE-2
2Basic {D} EnergySVE-7
Dudunsparce / Risky Ruins — 60 cards, 23 distinct — the control build, submitted 16 August 2026.
Explore the decklist library
This interactive builder ranks candidates from the archived source lists. It is a data-exploration tool, not a winrate predictor.
Every card is ranked by how much of the field plays it, and the ranking
recomputes each time you add one. A slot is a card and a copy number, so the
fourth Dreepy is ranked separately from the first, and picking a card that
belongs to a package pulls the rest of the package up with it. The two sources
are kept apart because they disagree: energy denial is near universal on the
ladder and a minority choice in human tournament play.
The list
Most played next
The builder needs the site served over HTTP.
Historical feature coverage and stadium analysis
These descriptive summaries use the archived lists and field sample. Inclusion and coverage are not causal estimates of a card’s contribution to wins.
Mechanical features touched by each archetype’s list, of the model’s 194; ours in blue. Each archetype is shown at its widest recorded list.
How much of the field each of our Stadiums touches, over every ladder list from 6 to 12 August.
Results
The submission won 57.4% of 1,999 games and peaked at a rating of 1124, inside the top twenty. Meta-predict did better against Crustle; Control was solid across the field. See Performance for matchup results and the post-deadline comparison.